Which handles better?

[bmxdave]

So ive been looking at another project to have a play with, and ive always fancied a track car. I love classic 60's touring cars too.

 

So im after a 100e or a 105e. Its going to be done on the cheapest of budgets. I have a 1600gt crossflow to go in. And was hoping to pick up something with tatty to decent bodywork i can just tidy up, and maybe do a dodgy home respray too.

 

As im trying to spend as little as possible, im most likely just going to fit adjustable shockies, some wider wheels, and maybe lower the car. So with as little mods as possible, which handles better of the two?

 

Personally i prefer the looks of the 100e, but if the 105 handles better, surely its the best choice?

[petrolhead01]

100e all the way but im biased!!!

[ZetecVan 2.0]

105e all the way, but I'm biased.

[me bitch]

100e all the way you dont want a harry potter car do you

[bmxdave]

I prefer the looks of the 100e, but its whats underneath that counts.

[AngliaSuper]

Get Your Poll Out 105E! There's loads more options.

[xpackken]

dont worry dave ill sort you out with a cheap. mint oven respray .

_________________

Mercedes Benz 220

[Retromotorsport]

work the track to height ratio out and the one thats the widest and lowest will be the one you want .

 

Then again, I cant remember a 100E beating a 105E around any circuit when both are in standard form

[Jimbob-Squarepants ©]

105e

[V8ian]

100e all the way but im biased!!!

 

Its not the ability of your car to go round corners its the ballast of the driver helping it most

[Gareth]

They're very similar underneath aren't they

[bmxdave]

I always thought the 100e was on a swing arm hanger thingies whereas the 105 was on springs.

 

Cheers ken, ill get back onto about that, i need the tina doing soon.

[GT_Jim]

i would have thought the 105 would be better as it itsnt so stocky like the 100e compared to its wheelspan