Admin Vista Posted January 4, 2007 Admin Report Posted January 4, 2007 You'd better have your say before someone makes it up for you. http://www.oldskoolford.co.uk/phpBB2/vi ... 0&start=30
4parajon Posted January 4, 2007 Report Posted January 4, 2007 By the time he logs on it'll take him an hour just to catch up
DEP Posted January 5, 2007 Report Posted January 5, 2007 By the time he logs on it'll take him an hour just to catch up If he logs on
S2 Dee Posted January 5, 2007 Report Posted January 5, 2007 You'd better have your say before someone makes it up for you. http://www.oldskoolford.co.uk/phpBB2/vi ... 0&start=30 Too true. Given the manner in which the readership has found out I think Ben should make some statement regarding the demise of project 78. Especially as the project appears to be alive and well in the Feb issue.
diffed Posted January 5, 2007 Report Posted January 5, 2007 By the time he logs on it'll take him an hour just to catch up If he logs on is he bothered to log on
escortmad79 Posted January 5, 2007 Report Posted January 5, 2007 http://www.oldskoolford.co.uk/phpBB2/vi ... hp?t=25876
diffed Posted January 5, 2007 Report Posted January 5, 2007 http://www.oldskoolford.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=25876 so how come the mag are still doing a story on a car thats not their ? or is it ? and it does'nt say if it was sold
Twinkle Posted January 6, 2007 Report Posted January 6, 2007 the feb editorial seems to make out he still has it!! looks like he is gonna eat his words as he said
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now