Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Olny srmat poelpe can raed tihs.

I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!

  • Admin
Posted

Really smart people will spot that there is a mistake in line one. :mrgreen:

 

aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at

 

So are they trying to say "according to a research at" as suggested by the paragraph? In which case that's very poor english.

 

Or are they in fact trying to say "according to a researcher at" which reads correctly but isn't achievable with the letters they've used nor does the spelling they've used start and finish with the correct letters according to the rest of their paragraph.

Posted

my mams a lecturer and looked into this its pretty crap as it doesnt work with every word just common words and the paragraph changes between universities :lol: still cool though

Posted
thing is antz actually talks like that :shock:

 

thats just how i type :ykt::lol:

 

 

(i copied and pasted it from an email so i cant be blamed for bad grammar!)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...