Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

ive got a turbo yb but i want to convert it to na, how easy is it to do for an amateur? is it just swapping parts over or is there any machining to do? is it worth doing or is it worth just selling the turbo and buying one already done?

Posted
it was more work to remove turbo and fit carbs then it was to just fit and ecu

 

was it? it will be going in a mark1 escort and i thought if it was na it would save alot of cutting and the expense of the rear end to take the power of the turbo

Posted

Its probably not much difference pricewise to sort the rear end, (or fit some skinny tyres) than to convert the YB to carbs is it?

Posted

much of the same really,sorted english axle will set you back £1500 to cope with 220bhp+ or if you have the engine running turbo £2500 for nice atlas & you really only need to cut in abig tunnel. Which would help with n/a yb anyway. Gona cost you £2500+to by all the bite i.e carbs cams port work,pistons,gaskets,manifolds. :thumbsup:

Posted

i have been for a spin in a turbo and a NA cossie

 

dont waste your money going NA just keep it turbo!

 

easier and faster

Posted

It ain't cheap! new pistons, a lot of head work, opening up porting etc, new valves, camshafts, convert to solid lifters, springs, decent head gasket as the compression ratio is raised, mines 12.5:1, new inlet and exhaust manifolds, carbs or throttle bodys, the list goes on!

Posted

Depends what your into (costs aside). If you want to open your bonnet and have a fooking awesome looking engine in there that is 'correct' for an osf... then go N/A, you get all the right noises too which for alot of people thats what its all about!

If you dont care about that sort of thing.... fit the turbo, but it makes all the wrong noises for an osf and doesnt look quite as cool.

 

0-60 is usually quicker in an N/A car though... something you might want to bare in mind. :thumbsup:

  • Admin
Posted
Depends what your into (costs aside). If you want to open your bonnet and have a fooking awesome looking engine in there that is 'correct' for an osf... then go N/A, you get all the right noises too which for alot of people thats what its all about!

If you dont care about that sort of thing.... fit the turbo, but it makes all the wrong noises for an osf and doesnt look quite as cool.

 

0-60 is usually quicker in an N/A car though... something you might want to bare in mind. :thumbsup:

 

Are you sure you aren't mk1Gaz in disguise? :wink:

Posted
Depends what your into (costs aside). If you want to open your bonnet and have a fooking awesome looking engine in there that is 'correct' for an osf... then go N/A, you get all the right noises too which for alot of people thats what its all about!

If you dont care about that sort of thing.... fit the turbo, but it makes all the wrong noises for an osf and doesnt look quite as cool.

 

0-60 is usually quicker in an N/A car though... something you might want to bare in mind. :thumbsup:

 

Are you sure you aren't mk1Gaz in disguise? :wink:

 

lol, tell me i'm wrong though Scott!? Classic cars should really have the sound-track to go with it! Not any whoosh bangs! I'm not against turbo YB's but the guy was wondering what route to go down.

Imagine a Lovely E-type jag whooshing down the road? that wouldnt be right would it!?!?

  • Admin
Posted

Ok you're wrong (well you asked me to say that didn't you?)

 

In my opinion, the best bit about owning classic cars is when you're able to show a clean pair of heels to something modern and expensive, especially as they're not expecting it. Now if a turbo is the best way to do that in terms of bang for buck then I don't care what it sounds like.........................so that's the way I'm going. :thumbsup:

Posted
the best bit about owning classic cars is when you're able to show a clean pair of heels to something modern and expensive,

 

+1 Hell yeah :ykt:

Posted
Ok you're wrong (well you asked me to say that didn't you?)

 

In my opinion, the best bit about owning classic cars is when you're able to show a clean pair of heels to something modern and expensive, especially as they're not expecting it. Now if a turbo is the best way to do that in terms of bang for buck then I don't care what it sounds like.........................so that's the way I'm going. :thumbsup:

 

Your putting a YBT in the RS2000 ??? !!!

Posted
the best bit about owning classic cars is when you're able to show a clean pair of heels to something modern and expensive,

 

+1 Hell yeah :ykt:

 

+2 :ykt::thumbsup:

Posted
Your putting a YBT in the RS2000 ??? !!!

 

:shock: Give me some credit, no. It's scary enough already with it's 2.2 pinto. See link under sig. 8)

 

Some credit? are you saying that it would be wrong to turbo the RS then? lol :?:?

Cool project though. Gaz certainly is the man.

  • Admin
Posted
Your putting a YBT in the RS2000 ??? !!!

 

:shock: Give me some credit, no. It's scary enough already with it's 2.2 pinto. See link under sig. 8)

 

Some credit? are you saying that it would be wrong to turbo the RS then? lol :?:?

Cool project though. Gaz certainly is the man.

 

No, I'm not saying it would be wrong I'm saying it would be too much power for it as it is.

 

Gaz do indeed make great coil over set ups :thumbsup: .

Posted

thanks for the help and comments. ive put a turbo yb in my capri and although it is quick when the turbo is boosting, i just like the noise of a set of 48s or 50s. my spare needs the bottom end rebuilding and the head is pretty dead so thought it might be easier to get it built into an na or even have a go myself. ill have to have a good think about it. thanks :thumbsup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...