Admin Vista Posted March 8, 2010 Admin Report Posted March 8, 2010 i disagree with an eye for an eye we live in a civilized society and shorley torchering or executing him would be barbaric i no what he did to jamie bulger was barbaric but if he has committed another hanis crime then shorley the goverment has failed us yet again WTF i think your probably pretty much on your own here mate ,but your entitled to your opinion of course . No he isn't, I also don't agree with state sanctioned murder. Murder is murder no matter who commits it. Yes he deserves to be punished and no he shouldn't be free. But he didn't set himself free after a measly 8 years of luxury confinement did he? No, in terms of how ridiculously lenient their sentence was, we're largely directing our anger in the wrong direction.
bigdaz27 Posted March 8, 2010 Report Posted March 8, 2010 none of us no the facts as to what he has or hasnt done and the law of the land is innocent an till proven guilty and as he is on a life license it woudnt take much for him to go back to prison so i think maybe its a little strong to wish him dead with out a fair trial
Smudger105e Posted March 8, 2010 Report Posted March 8, 2010 I must admit that although their crime was without doubt horrendous, I am not an advocate of capital punishment, and so don't agree with the life for a life way of thinking.
rallyesport04 Posted March 8, 2010 Report Posted March 8, 2010 torture it exactly how it torchered its victim
YOUNGY Posted March 8, 2010 Report Posted March 8, 2010 torture it exactly how it torchered its victim too right,or put him in a room with the parents
Guest cortinamad-gonetoo Posted March 8, 2010 Report Posted March 8, 2010 this is different to alot of crime though as what originally happened was just evil yes they were 10 but they knew what they were doing and poor jamie bulger was only 2 how was there ever a chance he was gonna get away or fight back
w p e Posted March 8, 2010 Report Posted March 8, 2010 someone will do the deed someday be it right or not
PIG Posted March 8, 2010 Report Posted March 8, 2010 as said the perants imo really should of been jailed years ago when the bulger tragedy happened,i see something this evening. NO ONE IS BORN EVIL,i agree with this i think so you can only think that the lads perants lack of love/care/respect/morals etc made the little mary in to the person he became
Mrs O/H/C Posted March 8, 2010 Report Posted March 8, 2010 A 10 year old SHOULD know right from wrong and if they dont then the parents are to blame Imo ....I feel that it is wrong for taxpayers to continue paying for people who have committed such awful crimes and inflicted such devastation to the families
Guest cortinamad-gonetoo Posted March 8, 2010 Report Posted March 8, 2010 but at the age of 10 they should know i cant see jailing the parents doing any good not unless the parents said go do it im pretty sure that jamie wasnt the first attempt didnt they trie to lure another child not long before???????? sure i heard something like that at he time they planned it they knew they are to blame they are King evil
Mrs O/H/C Posted March 8, 2010 Report Posted March 8, 2010 I am only blaming the parents for maybe not teaching their children Right from Wrong
Guest cortinamad-gonetoo Posted March 8, 2010 Report Posted March 8, 2010 I am only blaming the parents for maybe not teaching their children Right from Wrong yes i agree with that just dont think that jail for the parents would do any good though even now a days parents can go to jail for their kids playing truant you cant follow your kids 24 7 while they acctually go to school then maybe bunk off come home and say yeah i had a good day at school been there all day i just dont see the point in that sort of punishment just my opinion
Mrs O/H/C Posted March 8, 2010 Report Posted March 8, 2010 I agree that it is a pointless exercise sending the parents to prison too
FredTransit Posted March 9, 2010 Report Posted March 9, 2010 As I already said, sterilise the parents, it's genes the gene pool can do without! Also, if they have no more, they can't bring up any more kids in the same disastrous way. If the killers have siblings, they should have been taken into care too. I know that sounds harsh, but better adoption or a children's home than the kind of 'guidance' the two killers both had......
X-pack-Glyn Posted March 9, 2010 Report Posted March 9, 2010 someone will do the deed someday be it right or not Agreed, but that would be too quick and painless...
Billy_smith Posted March 9, 2010 Report Posted March 9, 2010 i'd quite happily mkae that piece of shit bite the curb
Guest cortinamad-gonetoo Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 i dont know how true this is but ive been told via a text message a prison warden doesnt think it should be kept quiet
Fishtailparka Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 Made up according to this http://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/black ... 6138383.jp
Fishtailparka Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 How would you feel if some innocent person was tortured and killed due to people spreading these lies? Is it any different to what happened to Jamie Bulger? Don't get me wrong, what happened to that poor little lad disturbs me even now, but torturing and killing (because that is what will happen) someone that had nothing to do with it is no better in my book. It is bad enough that 10 year olds could do such a thing, but for adults to go out and do these things deliberately and in a premeditated way to what could easily be an innocent person is nothing short of sick.
Admin Mk2Jo Posted March 10, 2010 Admin Report Posted March 10, 2010 I had the same text message but chose not to forward it on .... Like others have said, this could just have been some poor innocent guy whose name was banded around the www and via text messages because someone doesn't like him or someone thought it would be a laugh I would not want to think that some innocent person got injured/killed by mistake ... I would urge people NOT to forward any names without total proof
bortaf Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 i dont know how true this is but ive been told via a text message jon venables real name is******** he lives in ****** and raped a 19 year old girl in scool grounds in warrington. he spent time in**** at a child unit so knew the area. a prison warden doesnt think it should be kept quiet ****mod edit **** No idea about warrington but i know for a fact he spent time in N London in a secure unit, he was there for a few years and if it is a seecure child unit (which it would have been trust me i've seen the one he spent time in as he got older) how exactly did he get out to get to know the area I think people need to calm the fook down before an inocent person gets hurt
Guest cortinamad-gonetoo Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 i did wonder how he got out to know the area
Mrs O/H/C Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 seen that text alot in the last few days .
stevepeanut Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 I got that text last night at 9pm while trying to enjoy stereophonics in concert
bigdaz27 Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 who ever has started that text needs a good shoeing the poor man who that is is not conected to jon venables in any way please have a look at this before you send it on http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... ables.html
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now