Mr.Sumo Posted July 19, 2008 Report Posted July 19, 2008 ARE ABSOLUTE FOOKERS 2 and a half Feckin years of constant phone calls and reassessmants to sort my claim out and what do they do........ ....send me a demand for £21 , 076.18p To be paid in full within 2 years !!!!! What feckin Planet are these cocks on Rant over.....for now
oldbus Posted July 19, 2008 Report Posted July 19, 2008 I´ve been away too long. What´s this all about mate?
X-pack-Glyn Posted July 19, 2008 Report Posted July 19, 2008 Sumo, as discussed if you want any advice just give us a call mate... Oh, in a few months we are off as batman and robin and gona hang off a motorway bridge if you wana join us Should be some usefull advice on Fathers 4 justice site on CSA hasles mate, let us know and il get you some more sites with usefull advice too.
martymk1 Posted July 19, 2008 Report Posted July 19, 2008 thats crap feel for you, know how it feels ( only got 4 yrs to go on mine )
Mr.Sumo Posted July 19, 2008 Author Report Posted July 19, 2008 I´ve been away too long. What´s this all about mate? Basically i"m divorced from one of the most unreasonable , self centred greedy bitches evr born who wants to fook me over cos her junkie fella hasn"t got a pot to p*ss in and thinks i should pay for her ever more expensive lifestyle Am i being to sensitive..................
X-pack-Glyn Posted July 19, 2008 Report Posted July 19, 2008 I´ve been away too long. What´s this all about mate? Basically i"m divorced from one of the most unreasonable , self centred greedy bitches evr born who wants to fook me over cos her junkie fella hasn"t got a pot to p*ss in and thinks i should pay for her ever more expensive lifestyle Am i being to sensitive.................. Maybe your ex and my ex should get together then.
zetecmk2 Posted July 19, 2008 Report Posted July 19, 2008 can my junkie waste of oxygen ex join the party? i know how you feel!!
escortmad79 Posted July 19, 2008 Report Posted July 19, 2008 That's seriously shit dude! How do they expect anyone to pay that amount with a credit crunch in full swing, a recession on the way, the cost of fuel & food etc! Cocks!
Mr.Sumo Posted July 19, 2008 Author Report Posted July 19, 2008 can my junkie waste of oxygen ex join the party? i know how you feel!! Come join the club i know , lets start a " i hate my ex and the CSA " website
oldbus Posted July 20, 2008 Report Posted July 20, 2008 ....works the same way over here too and if there´s kids involved too you haven´t got a chance! Sounds like a good time to emigrate mate!!!
martymk1 Posted July 20, 2008 Report Posted July 20, 2008 can my junkie waste of oxygen ex join the party? i know how you feel!! Come join the club i know , lets start a " i hate my ex and the CSA " website i want to join
Mr.Sumo Posted July 20, 2008 Author Report Posted July 20, 2008 More the merrier Marty Membership details to follow.....with new web address RULES : 1 . No REAL names ( incase i / you get sued ) 2 . No photos ( refer to rule No.1 ) 3 . ............thats it
badchild Posted July 20, 2008 Report Posted July 20, 2008 go on the dole, every other mary gets away with it like that bastards
X-pack-Glyn Posted July 20, 2008 Report Posted July 20, 2008 Have they confiscated your passport yet mate, theres allways the option of emigrating if they havent. Be warned mate, the fookers can even confiscate your driving licence.
m1c Posted July 20, 2008 Report Posted July 20, 2008 More the merrier Marty Membership details to follow.....with new web address RULES : 1 . No REAL names ( incase i / you get sued ) 2 . No photos ( refer to rule No.1 ) 3 . ............thats it man im so up for that..... i phoned em last week to tell em i had another baby so can they re-assess my payments. i dont expect to hear from them in a hurry.
Admin Vista Posted July 20, 2008 Admin Report Posted July 20, 2008 I think that if the CSA had ever done what I believe it's original mandate was (i.e. chase up absent parents of both genders who aren't contributing at all) then it would actually be an organisation worthy of respect, after all I'm sure everyone agrees that it's only right and proper that both parents should help with the financial side of raising their children whether the parents are still together or not. Some years ago I was dating a girl who worked for the CSA and she said that frequently it's the absent MOTHERS who are in fact the ones hardest to raise money from and also the ones they get the most stick over the phone from. Instead however all I ever see or hear about is people who are already contributing being screwed over and forced to increase their payments to more than they can afford. The CSA was never meant to be a weapon for people to use against their former partners, but it seems to me that it's increasingly used that way. In the interests of a balanced thread, can anyone post up any cases where they think the CSA have got it right?
Mr.Sumo Posted July 20, 2008 Author Report Posted July 20, 2008 I think that if the CSA had ever done what I believe it's original mandate was (i.e. chase up absent parents of both genders who aren't contributing at all) then it would actually be an organisation worthy of respect, after all I'm sure everyone agrees that it's only right and proper that both parents should help with the financial side of raising their children whether the parents are still together or not. Some years ago I was dating a girl who worked for the CSA and she said that frequently it's the absent MOTHERS who are in fact the ones hardest to raise money from and also the ones they get the most stick over the phone from. Instead however all I ever see or hear about is people who are already contributing being screwed over and forced to increase their payments to more than they can afford. The CSA was never meant to be a weapon for people to use against their former partners, but it seems to me that it's increasingly used that way. Scott i couldn"t agrree more In the interests of a balanced thread, can anyone post up any cases where they think the CSA have got it right? Wouldn"t hold your breath on that one mate ..no offence intended of course
m1c Posted July 20, 2008 Report Posted July 20, 2008 In the interests of a balanced thread, can anyone post up any cases where they think the CSA have got it right? they sent me a cheque back where i actually paid something like £44 quid too much as they fooked it up working out how much i owed them in the first place. but its probably only cos i phoned em the other day they noticed
martymk1 Posted July 20, 2008 Report Posted July 20, 2008 More the merrier Marty Membership details to follow.....with new web address RULES : 1 . No REAL names ( incase i / you get sued ) 2 . No photos ( refer to rule No.1 ) 3 . ............thats it
Fishtailparka Posted July 20, 2008 Report Posted July 20, 2008 I don't know if it is still the case, but, at one time if they failed to make an assessment within 6 months you could not be held responsible for any back payments before that. You need to look into it a bit more as I am not sure if that has changed. Don't expect any sensible answers from them though. They are the most impossible people on Earth to deal with. Another thing to mention is that they used to be obliged to accept any reasonable contribution towards what you owe in back pay. I offered £5 a month and they had to accept it. It means I wouldn't have paid it off for 20 years or more. In fact I never did. My son lives with me now anyway
FredTransit Posted July 21, 2008 Report Posted July 21, 2008 I´ve been away too long. What´s this all about mate? just in case you hadn't realised the Child Support Agency is supposed to recover financial contributions from absent parents. As Vista said if they did what they originally were supposed to do it would be fine. Mostly they just cause aggro and hardship for the ones they can find, and let the ones they can't find (or are on the dole) off scot free.
Mr.Sumo Posted July 23, 2008 Author Report Posted July 23, 2008 Cheeky fookin Bitch ! Thought i would double check this demand the CSA sent me , so me Julie did a bit of investigating on my behalf , and guess what..... the cheeky cow has been claiming that my eldest 2 kids where at school still .....mmm...not true , you see they both left school May 2007 Which means the soppy cow is now getting a vastly reduced payment because i will only be paying for 1 kid , HAPPY DAYS ! With a bit of luck , the CSA will chew a couple of pounds of her for taking the p*ss as well.....oh to be fly on the wall when that phone call goes through
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now