SmokeEm Posted April 12, 2010 Report Posted April 12, 2010 Did we REALLY put men on the moon all those years ago, or do you think it was an elaborate scam to get one back up on the Russians for getting into space 1st? Discuss
bortaf Posted April 12, 2010 Report Posted April 12, 2010 What you meen all the trips there were faked? or just the first one and would it then follow that all the trips the Russians made afterwards were also faked cos otherwise they would have said "hang on a min weres the landinging sites the americans used ?" oh but then i guess the Russians were in on it to ? But then why would the russians keep quiet about it as well? obv cos the aliens told em too, yeh now it all makes sense
SmokeEm Posted April 12, 2010 Author Report Posted April 12, 2010 The trips to space were not fake, just the moon landing itself IMHO that is..
FredTransit Posted April 12, 2010 Report Posted April 12, 2010 Why would they go all that way and not land? IMO it's all or nothing, all fake or all real. Bortaf's right, the Russians wouldn't keep quiet if they found it to be fake. Why would they?
SmokeEm Posted April 12, 2010 Author Report Posted April 12, 2010 But it' snever been proved to be fake, nor has it been proved genuine. If we did do it, why haven't we attempted to go back? Just doesn't make sense. We have telescopes powerful enough to read newsprint on the moon but no-one has ever seen the lunar buggy left behind or the 'Landing' site. Its all piffle if you ask me Fred
SmokeEm Posted April 12, 2010 Author Report Posted April 12, 2010 I'm most looking forward to Scott's theory
Admin Vista Posted April 12, 2010 Admin Report Posted April 12, 2010 Check your history folks, the Russians have never been to the moon (they've only sent unmanned missions there) so they haven't simply been keeping schtum about whether or not the Americans left evidence of their presence there. Yes I believe the Americans landed there for the very same reasons people believe they faked it (i.e. to beat the russians to it). They invested what by todays standards would be trillions of dollars to beat the Russians to it..............why go to all that trouble, effort and expense not to achieve your aims? What's to go back for? It's a hunk of rock that is essentially a natural satellite that's onluy real effect on the earth is the occasional eclipse and spring and neap tides. They got some rock samples between 69 and 72, unless those rocks have suddenly gained new interest from the scientific community, the money it would cost to go back is probably better spent replacing the ageing space shuttle. Conspiracy theorists just aren't happy unless they've got something to whisper about. Some facts to shut them up: Some claims can be empirically discredited by three retroreflector arrays left on the Moon by Apollo 11,[21] 14 and 15. With new technology, it is possible for anyone on Earth with an appropriate laser and telescope system to bounce laser beams off these devices, verifying deployment of the Lunar Laser Ranging Experiment at historically documented Apollo Moon landing sites. This evidence indicates the deployment of equipment which was constructed on Earth and successfully transported to the surface of the Moon. In addition, NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, in August 2009, began to send back high resolution photos showing the Apollo landing sites.
FredTransit Posted April 12, 2010 Report Posted April 12, 2010 I would say they didn't go back cos they couldn't afford it.
sambo Posted April 12, 2010 Report Posted April 12, 2010 I love conspiracy theories! Thay are boooollox and are just busy bodies thinking they are clever! They did land on the moon. Fact. We dont go back cos its bloody expensive, as already mentioned by Vista. Also,......there are no aliens visiting Earth either, nor do ghosts exist, nor bigfoot. some people should wake up!! lol.
SmokeEm Posted April 12, 2010 Author Report Posted April 12, 2010 Also,......there are no aliens visiting Earth either: I'm not so sure - I know a few peeps who just cannot be from this planet Tony Boone is one for a start!
Admin Vista Posted April 12, 2010 Admin Report Posted April 12, 2010 I don't believe there are aliens visiting earth...............but I do believe in extra terrestrials. The universe is simply too large for this to be the only planet in it that can support life.
SmokeEm Posted April 12, 2010 Author Report Posted April 12, 2010 I reckon we've been visited. Area 51 n all that
stevepeanut Posted April 12, 2010 Report Posted April 12, 2010 http://www.oldskoolford.co.uk/phpBB2/vi ... light=moon this one came up a while ago
w p e Posted April 12, 2010 Report Posted April 12, 2010 I don't believe there are aliens visiting earth...............but I do believe in extra terrestrials. The universe is simply too large for this to be the only planet in it that can support life. ET's yes or why not?. as for the landing will we ever know?. i saw a documentry that said it was all fake and done in a studio as they recond all the shadows in the filming were in the wrong place's due to where the light was coming from. as for area 51 well there must be something to it who know's?.
emu Posted April 12, 2010 Report Posted April 12, 2010 There was an episode of mythbusters where they looked into this. they took a lot of the 'proof' that it was fake and investigated it. Things like the flag 'blowing' around and the shadows at differnt angles. quite an interesting program There was apparently plans to return to the moon ( the constellation program), but it had funding cut in February because of the economic climates. I also dont beleive we can be the only living planet. The are so many species of creature on this small planet, that cant possibly be the be all and end all. All those other planets and galaxies, one must be supporting life somewhere??
zetecmk2 Posted April 12, 2010 Report Posted April 12, 2010 all our views are based in what information we are allowed to know. i think the stuff we shouldn't know about but can't be hidden is far more intresting, like aurora etc.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora_(aircraft)
5hane Posted April 12, 2010 Report Posted April 12, 2010 I also dont beleive we can be the only living planet. The are so many species of creature on this small planet, that cant possibly be the be all and end all. All those other planets and galaxies, one must be supporting life somewhere?? 100% agree, hopefully, in the next 100/ 500 years, we will be the ones going around kicking there asses, unlike in the movies thats gonna be awsome !!! in all seriousnus (spelling ) i also beleive we cant be the only ones out there, but i dont think theve found us yet
bortaf Posted April 12, 2010 Report Posted April 12, 2010 TBH i cant be arsed to go through it all again just look back at the last thread about it in the link a few posts back Or do some bloody research
FredTransit Posted April 13, 2010 Report Posted April 13, 2010 I don't think we are the only inhabited planet either. Remember there was a time when we thought the world was flat, and it didn't occur to even the most learned scientists there were people on the other side of the planet. That's just this planet, so other worlds must be out there.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now