Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A man has been arrested for murdering a burgular ...he was at home when 2 men entered the house to steal. The homeowner stabbed one of the robbers and during this ordeal his wife and child came home.

He has said that this was an act of self defence as he was protecting his home and family.

 

So..should he be prosecuted for comitting a murder ?

Or..should he be let free for protecting his life and that of his wife and child ?

 

Please Discuss .......

Posted

The moment someone breaks into someone's property or attacks somebody they should lose any so-called human rights!! they get what they deserve, good on the home owner (just hope i'd be that brave)

Posted
sure i seen the family/friend/***** of the scum who was knifed leaving flowers ?!!! is this country gone to fook or what! no shame some people :(:

 

Hope he throws them in the gutter when he gets home from the police station !

 

I agree with speedy, he should get a bravery award, not arrested.

 

He won't burgul anyone one else now will he :mrgreen:

  • Admin
Posted

He will have been arrested for murder as it's standard procedure while the facts are investigated. It doesn't say he's been charged with murder yet does it.

 

I lie somewhere in the middle ground. i.e. if someone breaks into your house and you fear for your safety or the safety of your dependants, then let the twats have it and with both barrels..........

 

 

BUT

 

if said burglar has already left your house, you are unmolested and are now safe, then giving them/him/her both barrels in the back while they run away is simply a revenge attack and should be punished as such. No-one is above the law. It's for that very reason that Tony Martin went to jail for murder. He was not defending himself or his property, he shot that kid in the back purely out of malice. The kid deserved to be punished by the law and go to jail, he didn't deserve to die.

Posted

my dogs would get them before i had time to and will say i wouldnt call them off,end of the day they shouldnt be there.no i dont think the homeowner should get done.

Posted

vista tony martin had been done more than once and got little help ,i would pull the trigger too.i read that this is not the first case of this in manchester and the others have not been done by the old bill.

Posted

I Think if they are breaking into someones home or propery then they deserve everything they get, I agree with Vista that they should not be shot in the back...but maybe just wounded then brought back into the garage and tortured for a while...then Jailed!!!!

Posted

If he gets banged up for that i think its wrong i mine what the fook :banged: My house my family you think you can just walk in and help your self why'll i watch and wait 2 days for the police yeah right fair play to him . Like has been said what are the rights?

Posted

I think he'll get off scott free, his family arrived during the 'raid' and im sure he'll use this in his defence.

 

In a way he's doing a better job than the courts/prisons we have in the UK, one less person stealing from others to worry about...

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Admin
Posted

It goes back to the question of was he defending himself / under threat at the time or did he shoot at them as they left?

 

The first is defensible, the second possibly not. Additionally, what did he shoot them with? Possession of a firearm of any kind has to be legal or he won't have a leg (no pun intended) to stand on.

  • Admin
Posted

I understand where the law is coming from but don't particularly agree with parts of it (but yes, I know, the law IS the law :thumbsup: ). As far as I'm concerned if some thieving scum bag fooker has broken into your house or invited themselves in for questionable reasons ie. to nick what they can, then they deserve everything they get :thumbsup::lol: Probably not the right answer but that's my opinion :mrgreen::lol:

Posted

by commiting a criminal act they are taking the victims basic human rights away, therefore the criminal is not entitled to any basic human rights and must accept the consequences! end of!

  • Admin
Posted

I'm sorry guys, whilst I agree that they had it coming, you can't just go around shooting people because you're pissed at them. Sure if your life or your dependants lives or safety are a threat then yes. But because they're hot footing it down the drive with the keys to your Audi? No.

Posted

i agree with you to an extend Scott, and as an ex forces guy you will also know about rules of engagement, endangering life and property; shooting someone in the back whilst they run away is a definate no no, but apprehending that person without endangering yourself or others is perfectly acceptable, if the criminal is wounded in the proccess then that is their tough luck; and if that person recieves a fatal wound while you defend yourself or others or property you should never be penalised for it unless it is malicous which i highly doubt in most situations.

Posted

i wouldn't shoot them in the back they could survive it would be in the head

no mercy :twisted: touch my shit i kill yer dead :evil:.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...