Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

just seems to take all the fun out of it for me,

I quite like trying to see what I can get from my 1600, if I wanted to go 2L I think I would go camy.

just me and my opinion

Posted

Bad news I think, sounds to me like Ford have changed it for a Lotus type block instead. Maybe someone could work out the capacity from this but I don't think its much more the 1600 with a shorter stroke.

 

What they can be bore out to is another matter though.

 

Dave,

 

The M-6010-20K has been replaced by M-6010-16L (for Lotus)

 

Details below

 

Cost would be £1045.00+VAT

 

Ford Racing currently has an estimated delivery date of November 2010

 

Regards

 

 

 

M-6010-16K at 8.32"(Kent)

 

M-6010-16L at 7.90 (Lotus)

 

* Semi-finished bore diameters, 3.186" (Kent) and 3.260 (Lotus) respectfully.

 

* Block cast from 40,000 PSI grey iron

 

* Lower clutch housing bolt bosses reinforced

 

* Select areas around main bearing webs strengthened

 

* Center main will accept upper and lower crankshaft thrust bearing inserts

 

* Lifter bore diameters of 0.565"

 

* Includes precision cam bearing inserts installed.

:(:(:(

 

Salv Sacco

 

Technical Support

 

Power Torque Engineering LTD

 

Tel 02476 561605

 

Fax 02476 635878

 

email salv@powertorque.co.uk

Posted

Reading it again i'm abit confused now.

 

The part number now ends in 16 which would suggest its 1600cc as the lotus twink was. But the bore and stroke figures are very similiar to those on there website for the 2000cc

Posted

seems they may have got the numbers mixed up and not replaced the 'we are doing a 2.0l block' with a 'we are no longer doing a 2.0l block but are doing a lotus block'

i want to know how thick those walls are too :D

Posted

could these be the basis of a true 200bhp n/a crossflow?

combined with a good alloy head and masses of capacity there potential, definately.

 

anybody got the lottery numbers for this weekend? :beer:

Posted
I think Toby kents 1900 and something pre x flow is on an original 'L' block

 

so it can be done on one of those blocks :thumbsup:

 

puddy :mrgreen:

 

It is mate, you are right, however a tall AX block would be better for less rod angularity. I would hope they have cast a standard height crossflow block capably of an 87mm bore - like some of the best AX blocks. These would be the ideal foundation for a big XF - mine is a compromise with issues that involved the water and oil ways.

 

I run an 85.4mm bore iwth an 84mm stroke for 1924cc

 

86mm pistons would be 1950cc

 

But a new AX block should do - 87mm Bore with an 84mm stroke - 1997cc. :P

 

Even a YB-loving heathen like yourself would want one! :ykt::wink::mrgreen:

Posted
I think Toby kents 1900 and something pre x flow is on an original 'L' block

 

so it can be done on one of those blocks :thumbsup:

 

puddy :mrgreen:

 

It is mate, you are right, however a tall AX block would be better for less rod angularity. I would hope they have cast a standard height crossflow block capably of an 87mm bore - like some of the best AX blocks. These would be the ideal foundation for a big XF - mine is a compromise with issues that involved the water and oil ways.

 

I run an 85.4mm bore iwth an 84mm stroke for 1924cc

 

86mm pistons would be 1950cc

 

But a new AX block should do - 87mm Bore with an 84mm stroke - 1997cc. :P

 

Even a YB-loving heathen like yourself would want one! :ykt::wink::mrgreen:

 

Whats the limit for an old AX block Toby ??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...